LIBRARY: Tutorials Reviews Interviews Editorials Features Business Authors RSS Feed

A little animated about 24p?

A little animated about 24p?


A CreativeCow.net "Real World" Product Review


Producing, editing and delivering animated content at 24p with Aurora Igniter Film


Marco Solorio
Marco Solorio
OneRiver Media
Concord, California, USA
www.onerivermedia.com
Article, photos and images © 2002, Marco Solorio

Article Focus:
For those of us that are still "young at heart" and watch cartoons on TV, you'll notice that even today many animations are still hand drawn at 24 Frames Per Second (FPS) or 24 "fips" as it's sometimes referred. In this article, Marco Solorio explains why this time old honored technique can still be used today for maximizing your production time and most importantly, the look and feel of your animations.


This article is based around the Aurora Igniter and the Aurora Film card option. This is basically a daughter card that sits atop Igniter's main PCI card. The Film card enables the following RT capabilities in Standard Definition:
  • RT Inverse Teleciné
  • 3:2 Pull-down on output
  • Audio timing compensation to match 24 or 23.976 FPS rate
  • Letterbox mask on output at any custom aspect ratio



Although the Aurora Film card is mostly geared towards people editing film, capturing telecined footage from tape with RT inverse telecine and outputting with a Cinema Tools cut list, we will focus on how this card can function as a tool for animators and their production workflow.


A little history...

Cartoons have been traditionally shot at 24 FPS, which is the same frame-rate motion pictures are shot (not taking into account under or over cranking of course). Even traditional "Dope Sheets" (or "X-Sheets") in which animations are timed to are grouped nicely into 8-row segments (each single row represents a frame of film). Three segments (24 rows) equal 1 second of animation time. Coincidently, two segments (16 rows) equal one foot of 35mm film, but I digress. When the painted animation cels are completed, the animation photographer shoots one cel at a time in strict accordance with the dope sheet. When the photographer completes 24 shots, he or she has completed one second of finished media.

So how does this translate into digital animation? Believe it or not, 24 FPS production not only looks cool, but can also save you tons of production time whether you're doing 2D or 3D animation.


Interlaced fields and progressive frames

When we work with video at 29.97 FPS, we always work with interlaced fields. For every frame of video, there are two sets of interlaced fields: an "odd" or "upper" field and an "even" or "lower" field. These fields change 60 times per second. It's this interlacing that causes video to have a clean, smooth and sharp look to it. Some may say video looks "sterile". If you pause a frame of video with motion in it, you'll notice horizontal lines 1-pixel in height. These lines will also flicker (when paused with both frames active) on your NTSC monitor. Upon playback, all is smooth.

When you see a system that incorporates 24p editing, this means it can edit at 24 FPS in progressive frame mode. Progressive frames mean there is no interlacing in the frame, thus producing a full vertical frame of information.

So the goal is to create 24p media and use it in our standard interlaced video world at 29.97 FPS.


Let's look at the production process

Whether it's an application like Newtek Lightwave 3D or Adobe After Effects, you work in a linear timeline and that timeline needs to get previewed from time to time to see how the animation looks after each change or addition. With a 24 FPS timeline, you've already knocked out 6 frames per second of processing time. Your animations will load up quicker for things like RAM previewing in After Effects and this is only the beginning.

Okay, so you're finished with your animation and you're ready to render your Oscar™ winning masterpiece. Typically you would render to 29.97 FPS, with either upper or lower field first. Did traditional animation use interlacing? Heck no! It was all shot in full progressive film frames! So obviously we want to follow that pattern. To do this, render your animation with NO interlaced fields at 24 FPS.

When your project is finished rendering, you'll notice something new... it rendered much, much faster! This is because: (1.) you are cutting out 6 frames per second and (2.) you are not rendering fields. When you do render with fields, you are actually rendering 60 "half" frames per second in most cases. So for every frame of video, the computer must recalculate data twice... for the upper field AND the lower field. Ah but with full progressive 24 FPS frames, we are only rendering 24 frames for every second of animation. In some cases, your render times could be cut by more than half. Do you like this idea so far? Read on, there's more!


Let's get vertical dude!

So how about a letterbox effect? Although this doesn't have anything to do with 24p rendering or editing, it can make your animation look cool and it WILL save you on render times too. Instead of simply adding a letterbox mask to create black bars on the top and bottom of the screen, simply change your frame size to the proper aspect ratio. For instance, let's say you want to create an animation with a 2:1 aspect ratio. Instead of rendering an animation at 720x486 (the D1 spec) with a letterbox mask, simply render your animation at 720x328, non-square pixels (or 720x364 square pixels) without a mask. By doing so, you've potentially reduced your render time because there is less data to render in a 328-high frame than a 486-high frame.

With smaller file sizes due to 24 FPS and a vertically smaller frame, there will be less bandwidth overhead on the system as well. This is especially helpful for people using the uncompressed Aurora codec. This is a prime example of a win-win-win situation!

Disk saving space using the Aurora Uncompressed codec on a 5-second clip:

720 x 486 @ 29.97 FPS 100.1 MB (20 MB/s)
720 x 328 @ 24 FPS 54 MB (10.8 MB/s)


It's worthy to note also that all these functions, be it 24 FPS playback, RT 3:2 pull-down, letterbox masking, etc., can all function outside of Final Cut Pro. If you render a 24p file out of After Effects, you can quickly open it up in QuickTime Movie Player (or any application that plays QuickTime files) and view it with 3:2 pull-down, letterboxing, the works... all on your NTSC video monitor. Don't like the render? Go back to After Effects, fix and re-render. No need to open up Final Cut Pro, import and playback (not to mention having to delete the file in Final Cut Pro if you don't like the render).


Editing 24p in Final Cut Pro with Igniter Film

When you bring the 720x328, 24 FPS progressive QuickTime file into FCP, make sure your FCP timeline settings are matched to the clip's resolution. One key item that can easily get overlooked is to make sure the clip's settings are set to non-square pixels in the FCP Browser. Last thing to do is make sure you have 24 FPS (or 23.976) checked in your Ignition Control Panel. If you rendered to the Aurora codec and all your settings are correct, the 720x328, 24 FPS file will plop right into the FCP timeline with NO import rendering or transcoding required. All Igniter RT capabilities will also function properly. You'll also notice that Igniter has automatically added black to the top and bottom of the screen for a perfect letterbox. How slick!



Note that the Editing Timebase is set to 24 FPS and the Field Dominance is set to None. The Aurora Uncompressed Quality setting can only be set to 75% (if you drag the slider bar, it will snap back to 75%), but is still at its best quality (uncompressed)... Aurora chose to snap it at 75% to more accurately reflect the 4:2:2 color space D1 video works in since video is not 4:4:4.

One thing I personally like to add is the Igniter Film card's RT letterbox mask. This way it cuts 1 pixel off the top and bottom of the rendered 720x328 file (if set to 2:1 aspect ratio) upon playback. Just in case there's a straying pixel in the render or there's a soft edge or whatever, the mask will take care of it. This is entirely not necessary, but I like to use it since the option is there and doesn't suck any overhead from the system. The real purpose of the RT letterbox mask is to cover up the film's key-codes from a telecined source. It's also nice for stuff shot on video with a specific letterbox ratio in mind. No need to suck up bandwidth power from Final Cut Pro's Letterbox Mask effect.

You'll notice that when you play an animation back in a 24p timeline, the Igniter Film card is adding 3:2 pull-down in real time to your NTSC monitor and VTR deck. This gives it that cool motion film look 24p is so famous for... that kind of dreamy, surreal, strobe-like appearance. Best part is that it's all real-time... no rendering at all! Your animation will now resemble the long process of traditionally photographed cels.


To p or not to p, that is the question!

One thing you don't want to do is mix 24p animations (with 3:2 pull-down for 29.97 FPS video) with natural 29.97 interlaced clips (like shot video). The animations will have the strobe-like quality, and the rest of the video will be crisp and clean. This could potentially make the animation appear it has been incorrectly rendered even though it truly has not. Likewise, you don't want to mix a 29.97 FPS interlaced animation with clips that were shot on film that keep their 24p dynamics with 3:2 pull-down. This can make the animation appear to look "cheap" since the animation doesn't reflect the high-end look of the 24p film it's trying to match. For the most polished results, try to stay away from mixing the frame rates of animation and shot video/film.

The only time mixing 24p and 29.97 FPS interlaced media seems to work is when the production is shot on 24p (film) and the ending credit crawl (rendered at 29.97 with interlacing) move upward. Since video is naturally interlaced at 29.97 FPS, it's wise to take advantage of this in credit crawls. The text will be easier to read with the slow upward motion.

Additionally, one should be careful how they move or animate objects in a 24p world. At just the right velocity, an object or character can appear VERY flickery, whether viewed on a progressive monitor (HD and computer monitors) or a standard video monitor with 3:2 pull-down. For instance, I once saw a nation-wide commercial on a major network during prime time from a major product company. Everything was shot on film and you could tell there was big budget on this one. They had product boxes (packaging) move from left to right and right to left. The flickering was so bad that you couldn't read the text on the product packaging! I only saw the commercial air once and figured the producer got fired. This is an area you must be aware of when storyboarding your animation for 24p. Pan just a bit too slow or a bit too fast and your motion will look like hell. Adding motion blur wont do much for curing the flicker either.


For the Web or CD-ROM

There's another fringe benefit to all this 24p stuff. By creating clips that are 24p, you can down-convert to a web or CD-ROM format with better results and playback performance. Since there are no interlaced fields in the video, converting the clip to a smaller format (like QuickTime Sorenson) wont have to blend or interpolate fields together. This could result in a cleaner and sometimes sharper image, depending on how little compression is involved in the final video file. Also, since the video is running at 24 FPS, you can either keep this frame rate which will produce a smaller web file than a 29.97 FPS web file, or you could cut it in half (12 FPS) without interpolation (thus maintaining image quality) and resulting in an even smaller video file with less bandwidth overhead. The benefits of 24p just keep stacking up!

Likewise, if you work in a vertically smaller frame size, you wont necessarily want a letterboxed video on your website or CD-ROM. Typically a properly squeezed frame size without the letterbox looks best. You can then compress the video to your web or CD standards without cropping and achieve a smaller file size with a less load on bandwidth.


Conclusion

There are some newer cartoons that are produced in standard D1 running at 29.97 FPS with interlacing, but in my opinion they don't look as good as traditional 24p. Although it may be a great cartoon, I think there's a certain subconscious feeling one gets when it's done in the surreal 24p fashion, which adds to the fullness of the animation.

Combining 24 FPS, no interlaced fields and a vertically shorter frame size for letterbox will all save huge amounts of production time, render time, file sizes and bandwidth overhead. Of course this is all possible without an Aurora Igniter Film system, but you'll need to do a lot of rendering with less flexibility in the end.

Your 24p animated production with 3:2 pull-down will look cinema perfect at project's end. With all the pluses of this card, I couldn't recommend the Aurora Film option enough. Watch out Hanna-Barbera, Aurora Igniter Film users are on the cutting edge!


The Aurora Igniter Film card option lists for $3,999.00 as of June, 2002.




Marco Solorio is a multi-award winning digital media producer in the San Francisco bay area. He owns and operates OneRiver Media, which focuses on producing animated content for broadcast, as well as serving production needs for content developers. The new OneRiver Media Demo Reel is being edited (and created) entirely in 24p at 720x328. And of course, Dexter's Laboratory is his most favorite cartoon in the world.

Article, photos and images © 2002, Marco Solorio



Please visit our forums at CreativeCOW.net if you found this page from a direct link.




Related Articles / Tutorials:
Aurora Video Systems
Aurora PipePro

Aurora PipePro

Aurora's PipePro is a single-slot PCI card with SDI/Firewire input with embedded audio, analog component, S-Video and composite output, 4 channel AES audio in, 6 channel AES audio out, RS-422 control, Genlock and many other features -- all for $799 (US). Here is Walter's report for Cow members.

Review
Walter Biscardi
Recent Articles / Tutorials:
AJA Video Systems
AJA Video Systems Celebrates 25 Years of Professional Video Systems

AJA Video Systems Celebrates 25 Years of Professional Video Systems

John Abt started AJA Video Systems with his wife Darlene in 1993 to develop simple digital parallel to serial and serial to parallel converters. Many of AJA’s products at their core continue to bridge connectivity and simplify pro video workflows through video up, down, cross format conversion. A great read that you will find at Film and Digital Times.

Editorial, Feature, People / Interview, Business
Film and Digital Times
TV & Movie Appreciation
VFX Legion Completes Effects for SUPERFLY Remake

VFX Legion Completes Effects for SUPERFLY Remake

Producer Joel Silver and Director X called on VFX Legion to tackle 100+ shots designed to amp up the impact of the raw violence in Sony’s reboot of the iconic ‘70’s film. The reboot of ‘Superfly’ puts a modern, stylish spin on the original 1972 film about a Harlem drug dealer trying to score one last deal before getting out of ‘the game.’ Set in present-day Atlanta, the Mecca of today’s popping music scene, the action is driven by a hip-hop soundtrack curated by Future. The city’s distinctive style is the backdrop for a new generation of affluent, extravagant drug kingpins that takes violence to the extreme.

Editorial, Feature, Project
VFX Legion
VR Filmwork: Immersive Begins to Emerge ... Slowly

VR Filmwork: Immersive Begins to Emerge ... Slowly

Want to see a storage person's heart skip a beat ... or two? Flutter even? Just mention VR and BAM!, they get real excited. Some people think we like 360/VR just because it devours so much storage capacity. Ok that's a good reason but still the good VR stuff is really really good. Not just scare your pants off good but good to experience, enjoy, be immersively entertained, informed.

Editorial, Feature
Andy Marken
Christina Rzewucki: Thor: Ragnarok, Tomb Raider & more

Christina Rzewucki: Thor: Ragnarok, Tomb Raider & more

Christina Rzewucki is a Texture and Look Development Artist at Rising Sun Pictures. A 2016 graduate of the Academy of Interactive Entertainment in Adelaide, she began her career with the game company Monkeystack. Since joining RSP in 2017, she has applied her diverse technical and creative skills to projects including the blockbusters Thor: Ragnarok and Tomb Raider. Next month, she will be teaching the texturing component of ‘Look Development and Lighting,’ a new second year elective course associated with UniSA’s Media Arts degree.

Editorial, Feature, People / Interview
Risingsun Pictures
Cinematography
RBG's DP: Claudia Raschke, Ruth Ginsburg & Canon C300 Mk II

RBG's DP: Claudia Raschke, Ruth Ginsburg & Canon C300 Mk II

In his conversation with Claudia Raschke, the cinematographer of the acclaimed documentary "RBG" featuring Supreme Court Justice and folk hero Ruth Bader Ginsburg, DP Jimmy Matlosz speaks to her about the Canon C300, the challenges of shooting such a high-profile subject, and the influence of dance on her approach to documentary filmmaking. A truly remarkable conversation about multiple remarkable subjects.

Feature, People / Interview
Jimmy Matlosz
Business & Marketing
Media after Millennials: A Teen’s Research on Viewing Habits

Media after Millennials: A Teen’s Research on Viewing Habits

As a fifteen year old high school sophomore, Helen Ludé has her priorities in order: varsity soccer, Snapchat and Instagram, and presenting research on Post-Millennial Media and Cinema Consumption Habits at SMPTE’s Future of Cinema Conference. Spurred on by a dinner conversation with her family (including her father, RealD’s Peter Ludé), Helen conducted a survey of her peers to uncover the viewing habits of her generation, otherwise known as Gen Z. You're going to be surprised by what she found, and deeply impressed (and a little intimidated) by this enterprising young woman.

Feature, People / Interview
Kylee Peña
TV & Movie Appreciation
Star Wars: How Much Is Too Much?

Star Wars: How Much Is Too Much?

When Disney announced that they would be making a new Star Wars movie every year for at least 10 years I was both excited and a bit skeptical. In 2012 when Lucas sold his company to Disney for $4billion, he included his outlines of Episodes VII, VIII and IX. But Disney and Co. decided to discard these stories and start over, also discarding the extended universe of comics and books that millions of SW fans had grown to love. Adding JJ Abrams to the mix was icing on the cake for SW fans who have become critical of SW. But Lawrence Kasdan was the saving grace, who wrote a script for VII that the original actors could get behind. So, how much Star Wars is too much?

Review, Editorial, Feature
Mike Cohen
Art of the Edit
Editing Marvel's Black Panther: Debbie Berman ACE

Editing Marvel's Black Panther: Debbie Berman ACE

This is an epic tale spanning two decades, three countries, 12,000 miles -- and that's just the story of Debbie Berman, ACE, starting in reality TV and indie film in South Africa, making her way to Canada and then the US to edit Marvel's Spider-man: Homecoming and, most recently, Black Panther, already one of the most popular films of all time. In this exclusive interview with Creative COW Managing Editor Kylee Peña, Debbie talks about struggling toward US citizenship, a serendipitous meeting with an ambitious young director, helping to bring representation to the big screen and pride to her home country.

People / Interview
Kylee Peña
Broadcasting
Westdoc Online interview with National Geographic Channel's VP of Development, Charlie Parsons

Westdoc Online interview with National Geographic Channel's VP of Development, Charlie Parsons

Charlie Parsons is Vice President of Development for the National Geographic Channel, responsible for developing new projects, discovering new talent and serving as one of the network’s main points of contact for the global production community. Since joining the Channel in 2010, Parsons has developed popular series “Doomsday Preppers”, “Inside Combat Rescue”, “Mars” and “One Strange Rock”, as well as the global natural history event “Earth Live”. He developed the Emmy Award winning Special “Space Dive”,as well as the Emmy Award winning feature doc “LA 92”. He also served as an Executive Producer on the network’s most watched program in history, the Emmy nominated three-hour movie event “Killing Jesus”, as well as the second and third most watched programs, “Killing Kennedy”??"also Emmy nominated for Outstanding Television Movie??"and “Killing Lincoln”, respectively.

Editorial, Feature, People / Interview
Chuck Braverman
MORE
© 2018 CreativeCOW.net All Rights Reserved
[TOP]