LIBRARY: Tutorials Reviews Interviews Editorials Features Business Authors RSS Feed

Breaking The Drone Code: 336, 333, 107 (Part 1)

COW Library : Drones/UAV : Douglas Spotted Eagle : Breaking The Drone Code: 336, 333, 107 (Part 1)
CreativeCOW presents Breaking The Drone Code: 336, 333, 107 (Part 1) -- Drones/UAV Feature


Drones Plus
Las Vegas, NV
CreativeCOW.net. All rights reserved.


An understanding of the Drone Code may help clarify the lines the FAA and UAS/UAV/drone owners have drawn in the sand for each other, and like sand on a beach, the Drone-Code may seem to shift at the whims of legislation, lobbyists, manufacturer organizations, government agencies, and UAS users.

The FAA defines the lines via regulation, in the form of laws, advisories, and recommendations.

The AMA/Academy of Model Aeronautics defines the lines via organizational agreements with its membership, whose compliant behavior is accepted as a standard by the FAA.

UAS/UAV/Drone users define the lines through a mix of compliance and intentional ignorance of the framework setup by the FAA and hobby associations.

Some that ignore the laws, regulations, recommendations, and hobby organization agreements may be doing so out of "not knowing what they don't know.".


333 EXEMPTION

The reason for the FAA 333 Exemption is to allow drone owners/pilots to commercially fly UAS/UAV for a variety of purposes such as cinema, corporate video, aerial inspections, surveying, mining, law enforcement, orthomosaics, mapping, monitoring construction, and other professional purposes.

Currently the FAA views and classifies UAS as “Civil Aircraft.” This means that until Part 107 is executed, the legal perspective classifies UAS with the same classification as manned aircraft.

Currently the focus is on manned vs unmanned vehicles, although this is shifting as the two industries continue to cross over and blur the lines. At the time of this writing, there are just over 5,000 exemptions that have been granted.

If a lawyer or organization is asking anything over $1000.00 for a 333 Exemption service, it’s a rip-off. Fly away.


336 EXEMPTION

The FAA has instituted what is known as a 336 Exemption that allows drone owners to fly their drones recreationally, for purposes of fun and personal use.

Specifically, it states that 336 defines model aircraft as aircraft. Commercial UAS operations are prohibited without FAA authorization. The 336 statute requires model aircraft to be flown strictly for hobby or recreational purposes and within the operator’s Visual Line of Sight (VLOS).

Many “recreational users” want to consider themselves skilled professionals at taking imagery of homes for their buddy who is a real-estate salesperson, or film a marathon for the race participants so they’ll have an event video, or even just taking great shots to ‘give’ to a stock footage company.

The web is full of posts suggesting “just wing it” and “take the risk, the FAA isn’t going to hassle you.” The web is equally filled with drone owners completely ignorant of aviation standards such as those found in the Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) not to mention the operators who struggle and out-right deny to understand that a remote-controlled device (RC) can be in any way, construed a danger to manned aircraft. While many of them consider themselves “informed.”

This is where the greatest communication challenges seem to arise.

A recent example is demonstrated by a non-333 Exemption holder being invited to film a marathon race in Brooklyn, NY. As this chart shows, the Brooklyn area is virtually entirely a Special Flight Rules area, and not only would 336 flight be a challenge, but a 333/Commercial Flight would likely not be covered without separate permissions.



However, the members of the drone community indicated that the non-333 Exempt drone owner should “go ahead and fly the gig, no one will care” and “The FAA would have to prove you’re not doing it for fun” even though the non-exempt operator himself, was questioning the legality of his intentions.

Not the best plan in any circumstance, but contacting the local Flight Standards District Office/FSDO might be a good idea.

The FAA is at some point in time going to execute a new FAR section, Part 107. This was originally scheduled to occur on April 1, 2016. It wasn’t implemented on time due to language revisions, but is expected to execute in June or September of 2016.

This addition to the current FARs puts drones into their own category rather than the current Frankenstein amalgam of Part 55, Part 61, Part 91, Part 101, Part 103, and Part 105 with bits and bytes cobbled from other FARs.

Part 107 offers a better separation of UAS from manned aircraft, and requires a knowledge exam to be passed by potential operators.

Note the use of the word “operator” vs “pilot.” Pilots fly aircraft, operators fly UAS.


PROPOSED PART 107 OPERATOR REQUIREMENTS
  • Pass an initial aeronautical knowledge test at an FAA-approved knowledge testing center. This would likely be your local flight school location or through an agency like Drones Plus.
  • Be vetted by the Transportation Security Administration.
  • Obtain an unmanned aircraft operator certificate with a small UAS rating (like existing pilot airman certificates, never expires).
  • Pass a recurrent aeronautical knowledge test every 24 months.
  • Be at least 17 years old.
  • Make available to the FAA, upon request, the small UAS for inspection or testing, and any associated documents/records required to be kept under the proposed rule. Flight and maintenance logs are expected to be required, just as manned aircraft require.
  • Report an accident to the FAA within 10 days of any operation that results in injury or property damage.
  • Conduct a preflight inspection, to include specific aircraft and control station systems checks, to ensure the small UAS is safe for operation.

THE BENEFITS

No need for previously licensed FAA pilot as operator.
The Part 107 aeronautical knowledge test contains only segments from the Private Pilot test that are relevant to sUAS operations and nothing more.

An extra VO (Visual Observer) is not required for flights. One operator is the only individual responsible for the flight and the location of the sUAS. This relieves the burden of having to employ a two man team but it does require a much more observant operator who is both watching the computer and the sUAS at all times. As a risk-assessment professional, it will continue to be my recommendation that all commercial operations consist of a minimum of two individuals.

No need for Air Traffic Control clearance in class G airspace. In summary it means that uncontrolled airspace up to 500 feet is available to operators. This would negate the need for a COA (certificate of authorization) unless flights near airports (A,B,C,D airspace) or in otherwise restricted spaces are the intention.

Part Two of this discussion will delve into understanding airspace for UAV operations, whether 336 or 333.







ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Douglas Spotted Eagle


Douglas Spotted Eagle is the CEO of Drones Plus, Inc., and an audio and video pro. He is a Grammy recipient with DuPont, Peabody, and Telly awards lining his studio; he is also a participant/producer in multiple Emmy winning productions. Douglas is the Managing Producer for Sundance Media Group, Inc. and VASST, authoring several books and DVDs and serving as a trainer and consultant for videographers, software manufacturers and broadcasters.

He is the author or co-author of several digital media titles including Digital Video Basics (VASST), The FullHD (VASST), and Vegas Editing Workshop (Focal Press) among many others. Douglas is an accomplished aerial photographer who thrives in the adrenaline-filled world of fast-action videography. He remains active as a multimedia producer, trainer, and presenter, utilizing the latest technology as part of his workflow.



Comments

Re: Breaking The Drone Code: 336, 333, 107 (Part 1)
by Douglas Spotted Eagle
Thanks Mark!
Here is part 5, dealing with 107.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/article/obtaining-part-107uav-operator-certi...

Douglas Spotted Eagle
Sundance Media Group
Drones Plus+

Certified Sony Vegas Trainer
Aerial Camera/Instructor
Certified UAV Instructor
FAI Judge (Universal)
USPA National Judge
Re: Breaking The Drone Code: 336, 333, 107 (Part 1)
by Mark Suszko
Nice job, and one of the clearest presentations on the subject I've seen. You'll have to follow it up with an update when 107 is fully implemented.


Related Articles / Tutorials:
Drones/UAV
Drone Rules Suck...and Why You Want Them

Drone Rules Suck...and Why You Want Them

Rules! Why do we need so many rules for drones? Pilot, skydiver, and drone operator Douglas Spotted Eagle agrees, “Some of the UAV/drone rules and laws are not only unreasonable but downright ineffective,” but when you look more closely from a pilot’s eye view, they start to make much more sense. Starting with this principle: common sense isn’t all that common!

Editorial, Feature
Douglas Spotted Eagle
Drones/UAV
Drones/UAVs, Cameras, and Beyond: Douglas Spotted Eagle

Drones/UAVs, Cameras, and Beyond: Douglas Spotted Eagle

When longtime Creative COW leader Douglas Spotted Eagle recently approached us with a suggestion to add a Drones/UAV forum to our extensive cinematography and videography communities, it immediately made perfect sense. And who better than Douglas to host? We also took this opportunity to speak to Douglas about the sweep of his career, from Grammy Award-winning musician and producer, through editing, cameras, training, consulting, to now, as an early adopter and advocate for UAVs.

Feature, People / Interview, Business
Douglas Spotted Eagle
Drones/UAV
UAV Filter Frenzy!

UAV Filter Frenzy!

Virtually every sUAV/RTF drone in the air uses the same image processing chip and most have similar lenses. None of them are ideal, and they all operate at very high shutter speeds. None of them allow for shutter speed control, and as a result, it's up to the user to slow the shutter speed. This can only be done through the use of filters, says longtime Creative COW leader and legend Douglas Spotted Eagle of Drones Plus. Join him for a closer look at more beautiful imagery from above.

Feature
Douglas Spotted Eagle
Drones/UAV
Drone Technology: Revolutionizing Aerial Photography

Drone Technology: Revolutionizing Aerial Photography

We take an artistic, non-technical and historical view of Drones; where they've been and where they're headed.

Editorial, Feature
Liz Pekler
Recent Articles / Tutorials:
Art of the Edit
Growing Up on YouTube: Video Production, The Next Generation

Growing Up on YouTube: Video Production, The Next Generation

Through accessible tools and ease of engagement, young people like Sabrina Cruz have been able to grow up on YouTube and find one another. Underneath the amusing titles and colorful thumbnails, her videos have drawn over 10 million views with thoughtful messages woven together with high production value and editorial skill. Dismiss her as just a YouTuber at your peril. It's not that she's after your job. It's that she's one of the young creators helping change the world with intelligence, wit, drive, and an infectious optimism. Are you keeping up?

Feature, People / Interview
Kylee Peña
Art of the Edit
3 Mistakes All Beginning Editors Make, And How To Avoid Them

3 Mistakes All Beginning Editors Make, And How To Avoid Them

In the latest edition of his enduring series "This Guy Edits", Sven Pape covers the three mistakes that all beginning editors make -- mistakes he knows well, having made them all in his own editing career. Fortunately, he's learned the fixes by now too, and shares the easy workarounds in a high-energy, humorous fashion that will have even the most experienced editors nodding along and smiling in recognition.

Tutorial
Sven Pape
RED Camera
RED IPP2: Real-World Looks At An Image Processing Revolution

RED IPP2: Real-World Looks At An Image Processing Revolution

Science is one thing, the real world is another, and yet beautiful things can happen when the two interact with each other. Our conversation begins with RED Digital Cinema's Graeme Nattress explaining the ways that RED's customers are shaping the company's new approaches to color science, as reflected in RED's new image processing pipeline, IPP2. From there, filmmakers Chris McKechnie and David Battistella get specific about how RED IPP2 has revolutionized their RED workflows, both in the field and in post. No hype here. Just the facts, plus some very pretty pictures, and, okay, more than a little bit of excitement in the lab, in the field, and in the edit suite.

Feature
Christine Bunish
Business & Marketing
Authenticity: The First Step to Stock Video Success

Authenticity: The First Step to Stock Video Success

His stock footage has sold to the tune of $7 million dollars over the past 10 years, earning on average over $30,000/mo. Here, Robb Crocker shares the specific steps he took, and that you can take too, to build a successful stock video business: free from clients, deadlines, and creative limits.

People / Interview, Business
Robb Crocker
An Open Letter to Incoming Women Freshmen in Media Programs, by Kylee Peña

An Open Letter to Incoming Women Freshmen in Media Programs, by Kylee Peña

A lot of so-called “open letters” on the internet address the outgoing graduates of programs. And while they should bask in the glow of congratulations and good luck because they worked hard, they earned it, and they have some serious challenges on the horizon, this letter isn’t for them. It’s for you: the young woman who is leaving high school behind and beginning your first year of college in the next few weeks. Read on as Hollywood workflow supervisor and president of the Blue Collar Post Collective Kylee Peña reminds you: You have so much ahead of you!


Creative COW
My Illegal Internships: An Oral History, by Kylee Peña

My Illegal Internships: An Oral History, by Kylee Peña

Sure, unpaid internships aren’t exclusive to post production; however, for some reason we’ve collectively decided that the single biggest way to prove one’s merit is by working in some capacity for free. It’s almost as if everyone believes that because they suffered the difficulty of doing often humiliating or degrading work for free, everyone else should too. There are certainly times that personal enrichment worth the sacrifice to work for free, but employers, do you know if what you're asking interns to do for you is even legal? Follow along as Kylee gives examples from her own past internships to highlight current requirements, and lays out some suggestions to a fairer, more productive future for everyone.


Kylee Peña
MORE
© 2017 CreativeCOW.net All Rights Reserved
[TOP]